pietpetoors wrote:This is a "hear say" story so I wonder if some of our local electricians can confirm this:
An electrician told my brother in law that if something goes wrong with the ballast inside a fluorescent light, that the light will then use far more electricity than it should. He said that apparently the Fluorescent light can work without the ballast. He also said that most fluorescent lights' ballast only last about a year of normal functioning and then after that it starts to use more electricity. The danger here is that you think that you use a fluorescent light to save energy but in the end you do not really save because of a default ballast
Does anybody know if this is true?
It's amazing and disgusting what some people will say just to convince the lay person, as Mark says a flourescent tube will not work without the ballast, and as far as I know a ballast can last for a very long time - the fitting in our garage is going to 10 years, still works.
Our monthly bill comes to about R350 - R400 (ESKOM supply), sometimes even R450 depending how much baking was done.
But as said also try and save where you can, energy saving lights, geyser blanket and insulate water pipes, boil one and a half cup of water if making a cup of coffee instead of boiling 1.5 ltr of water. In winter dress warmly instead of using heaters - you'll be surprised how my people are obsessed with heaters
A friend of CupCakes mother calls me this past winter complaing that the mains keeps on tripping. So off I went and discovered that at any given point, they run 4 heaters in the house
they wanted me to "upgrade" the supply, which I refused to do for their own safety. Upgrading would have meant a bigger circuit breaker as per his suggestion. The breaker is there to protect the wire (insulation) and so advised them to either dress warm or consider something else. They were not impressed with me
Poor electrical insulation is one of the causes of fires in our homes.