31" VS 32"

Discuss modifications on your 1979 to late 1998 SFA 4x4 Hilux here.
Post Reply
Smi01466
Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:49 am
Town: Middelburg MP
Vehicle: 94 Hilux 2.4 4x4
Real Name: Gerhard

31" VS 32"

Post by Smi01466 »

Hi. Can I please get some advice on the subject. I own a 1994 2.4P D/C SFA Hilux. Currently fitted with 31x10.5 BFG AT tyers. I would like to fit 32x11.5 Kumo MT tyers. I know that I will sacrifice torq and fuel consumption. Can anyone perhaps give me figures and or advice of the influence that the biggar tyers will have on the vechile. Regards
User avatar
Mud Dog
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 29857
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:18 am
Town: East London
Vehicle: '90 SFA Hilux DC 4X4, Full OME, 110mm lift. Brospeed branch, 50mm ss freeflow exhaust. 30 x 9.5 Discoverer S/T's on Viper mags. L/R tank. (AWOL) '98 LTD 2.4 SFA, dual battery system. Dobinson suspension, LR tanks, 31" BF mud's.
Real Name: Andy
Club VHF Licence: HC103

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by Mud Dog »

31's is the max I would go (I have 31's on my own SFA). You're already sacrificing torque and fuel economy with 31's but it's still a fair option - the speedo reads correctly as well.

If you go with 32's I think you're going to be disappointed - economy and torque will drop off dramatically (you'd get better economy with a V8). You could try regain some of that loss with an EFI conversion, but that'll set you back quite a bit more than a set of tyres.

If you want to go the V8 route, then you will have to replace the complete drive-train, including diffs - the standard units will not be able to handle the power. Now you're talking serious moola that you won't get back if you sell the vehicle.

For what reason do you want 32's?
When your road comes to an end ...... you need a HILUX!.

Image
Image

Life is like a jar of Jalapeño peppers ... what you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
Don't take life too seriously ..... no-one gets out alive.
It's not about waiting for storms to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain.
And be yourself ..... everyone else is taken!
Smi01466
Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:49 am
Town: Middelburg MP
Vehicle: 94 Hilux 2.4 4x4
Real Name: Gerhard

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by Smi01466 »

Thanks Mud Dog. You are absolutly right. My decision to consider the 32's is purely for looks. As it is I can do with more torque. I just made up my mind, will stick with the 31's. Regards
User avatar
pietpetoors
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10650
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Town: Langebaan
Vehicle: 2.7 Hilux 4x4 DC
Real Name: Pieter
Club VHF Licence: X27
Contact:

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by pietpetoors »

Don't know about the SFA but on IFS you can fit 31 without any mods but for 32" you must either cut the front fender or do body lift.
Only Dead Fish Go With The Flow!
Image
1999 Hilux 2.7i 4x4 Raider DC with 3.4 Prado V6. Rear diff-lock, Bull Bar and rock sliders, 31" Cooper ST Maxx, Snorkel, Alu-Canopy, VHF Motorolla radio, West Coast Rust, Mikem Suspension, Ball Joint Spacers in front and Mikem extended shackles at the rear, 25watt LED Spots
User avatar
raider
Low Range 4WD
Low Range 4WD
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:55 am
Town: Cape Town
Vehicle: 96' Hilux Raider 2.4 4x4 SC, 12' Mitsubishi PJS 3.2 4x4
Real Name: Zubair

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by raider »

I'm not sure of 32" but when I spoke to Dino at Burnco a while back he highly recommended 33" over 31". His reason being it transform the SFA Hilux altogether. Makes it much more capable offroad. He owned a 2.4 SFA himself and according to him he got better fuel consumption as 33" kept the engine in the sweet spot as the 2.4 does not like high revs.

Also with regards to the lexus v8 the toyota 8" diffs are more than capable of handling the power including the gear driven transfercase. The weak link is the g52 gearbox but if not abused will handle the job. Most failures are due to poor installations or abuse. Also remember guys who do the conversions do it to drivetrains that have covered in excess off 200000km and then blame the gearbox.
User avatar
raider
Low Range 4WD
Low Range 4WD
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:55 am
Town: Cape Town
Vehicle: 96' Hilux Raider 2.4 4x4 SC, 12' Mitsubishi PJS 3.2 4x4
Real Name: Zubair

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by raider »

I personally have 31" Cooper STT's but will move over the 33" they are finished.

Also what is the purpose of your vehicle. Is it a daily drive or a weekend toy? If its a weekend toy then why not sacrifice some fuel consumption for capability?

But wait for replies from people that have the changed to bigger tyres.

I even remember Hoppy saying a SFA with 33" is a different vehicle altogether if memory serves me correct.

Also 33" might be cheaper or the same price as 32" due to it being more popular.
User avatar
4x4BEES
Monster Truck
Monster Truck
Posts: 3447
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:13 am
Town: Brackenfell
Vehicle: Hilux 4.0V6
Real Name: Kevin

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by 4x4BEES »

I have 33" BFG's A/T on and only have a 2.4D. I am quite happy with it.
I get 10km/l and my speedo is 100% accurate on GPS.
User avatar
Warrior
LR 4WD Full Lockers
LR 4WD Full Lockers
Posts: 562
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:40 pm
Town: Brackenfell Cape Town
Vehicle: 08 Vigo 4x4 d/c 4.0L auto
Real Name: Eben
Club VHF Licence: X138
Location: Brackenfell

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by Warrior »

31" on a SFA :silent:
Have you seen Bees , Francois's SFA at 4xLux & Swartvark : the way a SFA was ment to look.

32"s will definitely work and look great ! - maybe a bit slower and less torque.

Im thinking of selling my 32" Kumho MT's (80%) - to go for the magical 33"s on a Vigo :surrender:
(I do have a little more horses under the bonnet than you though :twisted: )
Tenk
Low Range 4WD
Low Range 4WD
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:34 pm
Town: Hilux Country
Vehicle: 07 hilux dc 4L v6 manuel, alu canopy, rock/s, full ome sport, Hoppy s/s custom exhaust, 33 grabber muds, compressor, exstra 80L f/t, dual battery,body lift,redpepper bumper,custom sound with sub,afternarket touchscreen entertain unit, dynoteck chip 188kw
Real Name: Pierre
Location: Brackenfell

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by Tenk »

Wat van 33's op n vigo? Is dit die moeite werd, bakkie is vir naweke en vakansies langer ente. Gaan seker n bodylift moet doen, gaan dit die bakkie top heavy maak?
User avatar
Warrior
LR 4WD Full Lockers
LR 4WD Full Lockers
Posts: 562
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:40 pm
Town: Brackenfell Cape Town
Vehicle: 08 Vigo 4x4 d/c 4.0L auto
Real Name: Eben
Club VHF Licence: X138
Location: Brackenfell

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by Warrior »

Ry al amper 2 jaar met n 3duim body lift. (Deur Mr. Hoppy) Geen probleme nie.
Hantering is baie goed - kan nog steeds gemaklik 160km/h ry met die 32"s.
Pel van my het 33"s op sy Colt V6 (minder krag as hilux) en hy trek baie goed , so ek het geen verskoning meer om nie ook na 33"s te gaan nie. :cooldude:
User avatar
Stef
Monster Truck
Monster Truck
Posts: 3125
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:54 pm
Town: Pretoria
Vehicle: '98 LTD
Real Name: Stefan
Club VHF Licence: X107

Re: 31" VS 32"

Post by Stef »

pietpetoors wrote:Don't know about the SFA but on IFS you can fit 31 without any mods but for 32" you must either cut the front fender or do body lift.
No mods for the SFA for 31", I did the axle move due the softe OME suspension, tyres used to catch on the inside fender seams on obstacles. Anything bigger than 31" I think the axle move is a must
Post Reply

Return to “1979 to early 1998 Hilux (Gen 3&4 aka SFA 4x4)”