Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Having problems with your vehicle? Or need advice on repairing or servicing your Hilux? This is the place to ask for help
Post Reply
User avatar
Petrusd
LR 4WD Rear Locker
LR 4WD Rear Locker
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:28 am
Town: Stellenbosch
Vehicle: 1997 2.4 Hilux DC 4x4 / Yamaha Motorfiets
Real Name: Petrus

Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by Petrusd »

I took these pics of the dash while driving this afternoon
I Still had one hand on the steering wheel :angel:
My speedometer is 100% spot on.
Checked it with two GPS`s.
Must be the 31" tires :think:


90Km/h @ 2600RPM
Image

100Km/h @ 2900RPM
Image

110Km/h @ 3200RPM
Image

120Km/h @ 3500RPM
Image

Which RPM would give the relative best fuel consumption per distance traveled?

Petrus
User avatar
Family_Dog
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 12702
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 10:09 am
Town: Klerksdorp
Vehicle: Hilux DC SFA, Hilux 2.7 DC, Hilux 2.7 SC, Prado 95 VX
Real Name: Eric
Club VHF Licence: HC101
Location: Klerksdorp, NW
Contact:

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by Family_Dog »

Bulldog is happiest at 110km/hr GPS speed, but that is at an altitude of some 1400 metres and using a fuel-injected 4Y 2200 engine. It just 'feels' better at that speed, although Bennie had a photo of the speedo at just over 150km/Hr once when he took Bulldog for a dyna at Schalk. That was before I had Cooper STT tyres fitted though.

31" tyres tend to make the speedo fairly accurate as well!


-F_D
Image

White Fang: 1999 2.7i DC Raider 4x4
Bull Dog: 1987 4Y-EFI 2.2 DC 4x4
Pra Dog: 1998 Prado VX 3.4
Hound Dog: 2000 2.7i SC 4x4


One Staffie, One Jack Russell, One Ring Neck Screecher, 17 Fish of questionable heritage


Image
User avatar
Mud Dog
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 29859
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:18 am
Town: East London
Vehicle: '90 SFA Hilux DC 4X4, Full OME, 110mm lift. Brospeed branch, 50mm ss freeflow exhaust. 30 x 9.5 Discoverer S/T's on Viper mags. L/R tank. (AWOL) '98 LTD 2.4 SFA, dual battery system. Dobinson suspension, LR tanks, 31" BF mud's.
Real Name: Andy
Club VHF Licence: HC103

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by Mud Dog »

Ja, with 31"s fitted the SFA speedos are almost spot on. Your best speed for good consumption is relative to the terrain (hills and downhills) as well as the nature of the load that you might be carrying (weight and aerodynamics with a roof carrier). As a generalisation you will probably find that somewhere around the 100 - 110 km/h mark will do best. I like to listen to the motor while keeping a note of the accelerator pedal position. Don't change down too late on hills ... I think you use more fuel that way. Avoid flooring it. The moment you start 'pushing it' fuel economy flies out the window. ;-)

Oops, I see Eric posted before me, but it's relative and we seem to agree on the speed.
When your road comes to an end ...... you need a HILUX!.

Image
Image

Life is like a jar of Jalapeño peppers ... what you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
Don't take life too seriously ..... no-one gets out alive.
It's not about waiting for storms to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain.
And be yourself ..... everyone else is taken!
JBurger
Low Range 4WD
Low Range 4WD
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:00 pm
Town: ......
Vehicle: .....
Real Name: ......

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by JBurger »

The faster you go, the more energy is required (fuel burnt). Yes you are also going further, but the fuel per km is more than when traveling slower. Imagine every km/hr represents air particles that has to be moved for your vehicle to pass through, let's just say at 60km/hr, you are replacing 60 air particles in one hour. At 120, you are replacing 120 particles per hour so, double the particles but also double the distance. So why are you using more fuel when speed increases???

Reason is that the particles have to be accelerated from their condition of rest to move aside so your vehicle can get past. At higher speed they have to give way faster, so more urge, energy, power, petrol, money is needed to give each and every little particle out of the way quicker for your brick shaped vehicle to pass through...

At relatively low speeds other factors may play a larger role so this may not always be true for very efficient (aerodynamic) vehicles, but mostly at low speeds and often for automatic vehicles with lock-up boxes that only lock at higher speed (say 80km/hr) you may find that the consumption does not always get better below certain speeds. Past 80 those little air particles get very upset for being shuved aside so violently, so they start putting up a real fight...

Cappish?
Image ImageImage
User avatar
CasKru
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 23956
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:52 am
Town: Benoni
Vehicle: '94 Hilux Raider 2.4i (22RE) DC 4x4
Real Name: Cassie
Club VHF Licence: B15
Location: Rynfield

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by CasKru »

When the guys try to set a longest range on amount of petrol record, they drive at no more than 90km/h.
To God be the glory
User avatar
ThysdJ
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 16587
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:31 am
Town: Brackenfell
Vehicle: 2010 Hilux D4D 3.0 D/C 4x4
Real Name: Thys
Club VHF Licence: HC102
Location: Brackenfell
Contact:

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by ThysdJ »

Kaspaas, with a rooftop tent fitted, at 100km/h used half the fuel over the same distance than without a rooftop tent at 130km/h. Proven this past weekend. :thumbup: :thumbup:

The best way to improve fuel economy is to contain the weight of your right foot... :silent: :silent: :silent:
Thys de Jager
CEO and Refreshments Manager at Team Offroad.

2010 Hilux 3.0 D4D D/C 4x4 with GOMAD "Brood" Canopy. Tripod.
1997 Jeep Wrangler TJ 4.0 Sport. The original SFA. AGA... Gooi kole
email: thys@teamoffroad.co.za

Like Team Offroad on Facebook...
User avatar
Petrusd
LR 4WD Rear Locker
LR 4WD Rear Locker
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:28 am
Town: Stellenbosch
Vehicle: 1997 2.4 Hilux DC 4x4 / Yamaha Motorfiets
Real Name: Petrus

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by Petrusd »

ThysdJ wrote:Kaspaas, with a rooftop tent fitted, at 100km/h used half the fuel over the same distance than without a rooftop tent at 130km/h....
Roofracks/Tents/etc on the roof can cost you anything from 1.5 to 3km`s less per liter of fuel.
User avatar
ThysdJ
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 16587
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:31 am
Town: Brackenfell
Vehicle: 2010 Hilux D4D 3.0 D/C 4x4
Real Name: Thys
Club VHF Licence: HC102
Location: Brackenfell
Contact:

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by ThysdJ »

Indeed, the RTT causes more drag, but I got better fuel consumption WITH the RTT at 100, than WITHOUT it at 130... granted, the RTT on Kaspaas is neatly half tucked away behind the cab, but it will still cause more drag.
IMG_3543.JPG
Thys de Jager
CEO and Refreshments Manager at Team Offroad.

2010 Hilux 3.0 D4D D/C 4x4 with GOMAD "Brood" Canopy. Tripod.
1997 Jeep Wrangler TJ 4.0 Sport. The original SFA. AGA... Gooi kole
email: thys@teamoffroad.co.za

Like Team Offroad on Facebook...
User avatar
Stef
Monster Truck
Monster Truck
Posts: 3125
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:54 pm
Town: Pretoria
Vehicle: '98 LTD
Real Name: Stefan
Club VHF Licence: X107

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by Stef »

My RPM's the same as yours, also with 31" tyres, STT Coopers nogals
User avatar
Maddoglips
LR 4WD Full Lockers
LR 4WD Full Lockers
Posts: 777
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:49 am
Town: P.E.
Vehicle: Raider 2.2 4x4; Mikem 50mm raised suspension, long range tank, Monroe gasses all round.
Real Name: Zane
Location: Port Elizabeth

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by Maddoglips »

Stef wrote:My RPM's the same as yours, also with 31" tyres, STT Coopers nogals

:thumbup: Same here
It's better to Burn Out then Fade Away.
User avatar
the BuTch3R
LR 4WD Full Lockers
LR 4WD Full Lockers
Posts: 792
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:13 am
Town: Cape Town
Vehicle: '89 Hilux SFA - SOLD; '95 Hilux - STOLEN; '67 Series 2A Land Rover; 3.5 V6 Pajero; 120 Prado VX 4.0
Real Name: Shaun

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by the BuTch3R »

Since I bought my 2.4P, I've been averaging around 5.5 km/l around town. :thumbdown:
But I knew I could expect to get better consumption on the open road.

I took a trip up to Heidelberg a few weeks ago. Cruised at 110km/h, hoping to get closer to 7km/l. I filled up again in Heidelberg and was shocked to discover that I had only used 32l for 254kms. Thats just less than 8km/l :thumbup:

Very content with the open road consumption, I decided to push it a little on my way back. Averaged about 130km/h...and my consumption suffered for it. All the way back down to 5.8km/l. :thumbdown:

So there's definitely a huge cost incentive to take it a little slower on the long road. Plus it's much safer too. A clear win-win in my opinion. :cooldude:
User avatar
cyborg
LR 4WD Rear Locker
LR 4WD Rear Locker
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:24 am
Town: Richards Bay
Vehicle: 1984 Toyota 4Runner 4x4 SFA ; 2011 Fortuner 4x4 ; BMW 650 GS
Real Name: Gerald
Location: Richards Bay

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by cyborg »

Always an teresting read this topic, but very dangerous too, 'cos suddenly one gets the urge to want to go change and swop and modify . . .
My ongoing debate (Between me, myself and I) is how much, and to what length should one go, to get your Hilux as efficiant as possible.
With the considerations of eventual Total cost in mind.
Currently I'm getting just over 7 km to a liter, on 31's. On a stock standard 2.2 4Y. With no extra load whatsoever.

I'm impressed with this, but want it better. I'm busy looking for someone who can supply Carb Jets, it seems the spares shops don't stock that kind of thing anymore ...
Hilux 4x4. . . . :thumbup:
User avatar
Stef
Monster Truck
Monster Truck
Posts: 3125
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:54 pm
Town: Pretoria
Vehicle: '98 LTD
Real Name: Stefan
Club VHF Licence: X107

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by Stef »

My semi accurate consumption is 4.5km/l. Tried to fill the tank Friday so I could get more accurate readings on my RDW trip, but I made the attendant stop at 100 litres :shock: and I had roughly 10 litres in the tank prior...

Must have a really loooong range tank :lol:

Want to hook up my 3.9 litre fuel can and drive it 'til it's empty; only wat to really know.
User avatar
Petrusd
LR 4WD Rear Locker
LR 4WD Rear Locker
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:28 am
Town: Stellenbosch
Vehicle: 1997 2.4 Hilux DC 4x4 / Yamaha Motorfiets
Real Name: Petrus

Re: Engine RPM Vs KM/H

Post by Petrusd »

Stef wrote:My semi accurate consumption is 4.5km/l. Tried to fill the tank Friday so I could get more accurate readings on my RDW trip, but I made the attendant stop at 100 litres :shock: and I had roughly 10 litres in the tank prior...

Must have a really loooong range tank :lol:

Want to hook up my 3.9 litre fuel can and drive it 'til it's empty; only wat to really know.

Mine is between 8.5km/l - longer distances, 7km/l - town driving and 5.8 km/l - speel op Atlantis se duine
Post Reply

Return to “The Workshop”